Air_Quality___Visibility_chapnumber0 Air Quality & Visibility

14.1 General Description106, 107

When the Clean Water Act (1977, 1990), Clean Air Act (1970, 1990), and the Endangered Species Act (1973) were introduced and subsequently amended by Congress, the national priority to provide citizens and wildlife with the healthiest environment possible had important implications and ramifications for each state. Besides mandates to better monitor all pollutants, states were directed to conform to new pollution standards as established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Figure 14.1

Figure 14.1. Example of Cloud Peak Wilderness Area visibility comparisons

Since then, many states have expressed dissatisfaction with the EPA on several counts. The first is that the federal government limits the amount of funding it provides to states to meet these requirements (unfunded mandates), and secondly, the pollution limits apply equally to all states although each state has unique attributes such as population size, topography, types and amounts of industry, differing agricultural practices, and climate just to name a few. After the 1970s, when researchers began touting global warming (the 1970s was an era when global cooling was in vogue), the issue of increased greenhouse gases became the rallying cry for environmentalists. It has been believed that with increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the earth would eventually warm like its sister planet, Venus, whose atmosphere is composed largely of CO2 and is hotter than the melting point of lead. However, as was discussed in the chapter on climate change, water vapor (H2O) probably has a greater influence on climate change through its complex positive and negative feedback mechanisms. As the controversy and emotions escalate in the years to come, the bottom line is that, if our quality of life is to be maintained or improved; conservation measures, development of new renewable resources, and retrofitting existing industries to limit pollution are important considerations for everyone.

14.2 Manmade Pollution

Despite the scientific and political issues surrounding pollution, Wyoming continues to have generally good air and water quality. This is due to a low amount of introduced manmade aerosols, low quantity of natural water vapor and airborne particulates, low population, and slow industrial growth. Even on poor visibility days, considerable distances are achieved (Figure 14.1). As shown in Figure 14.2, Sweetwater, Laramie, and Natrona Counties had the highest gross annual tonnage of emissions in 1999 while Hot Springs County had the lowest. "White" depicted counties had no monitoring equipment in 1999. A further breakdown of the 263 industrial plants that emitted pollutants are shown in Figure 14.3. Emission density maps showing Wyoming's various pollutants is depicted in Figure 14.4. Generally, the highest concentration of aerosols and particulates are located over southeast Wyoming with SO2 confined to the southern half of the state. The Scorecard ranks counties by total tons per county rather than considering tons per square mile of a county's total jurisdictional land and water area. The emission gradesheets (Table 14.A.) which are accessible through the website 111 consider county-by-county air emission densities in tons per square mile of the following pollutants: CO (carbon monoxide), Pb (lead) compounds, NOx (nitric oxide), VOC (volatile organic compounds), (PM10) particulate matter less than or equal to 10 micrometers, (PM2.5) particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, NH3 (ammonia), SO2 (sulfur dioxide), total HAP (harzardous air pollution), and two particular HAP's, namely diesel emissions and acrolein emissions. The grades are based on emission densities of pollutant tons per square mile.

Figure 14.2

Figure 14.2. Wyoming total emissions by county (amount) and square mile (density) (1999)

Figure 14.3

Figure 14.3. Wyoming emission facilities and pollution monitoring sites108

Figure 14.4

Figure 14.4. Wyoming pollutants as a function of density (1997-1998)

For the first eight pollutants except lead and its compounds, (CO through SO2, except Pb), emissions are based on 1999 data from the National Emission Trends (NET) section of the EPA's online database AIRData.109 Lead, total HAP, and acrolein are 1996 data, also from AIRData but under the section National Toxics Inventory (NTI). Diesel emissions are 1996 data from the EPA Air Toxics Website.110 Diesel emissions top the list of air pollutants adding to cancer risk. Acrolein (CH2CHCHO, pronounced a-kro'-lee-in, "acrid+olein") is the dominant air pollutant for non-cancer hazard. It is an air pollutant produced by forest and wildfires, open burns, structure fires, and as a combustion by-product of gasoline, diesel, and jet engines. One can find related consideration of these pollutants at online references. 111

The ambient gradesheets (Table 14.B.) reflect 10 EPA standards for air pollutant concentrations. These concentration limits are for various sampling periods from one hour to annually, and for six criteria air pollutants, namely CO, Pb, NO2, Ozone (O3), PM, and SO2. Grade F means exceeding the EPA standard.

Good air quality112 is necessary to avoid harmful health effects. According to the EPA, poor air quality causes visual impairment (Figure 14.5), reduced work capacity, reduced manual dexterity, poor learning ability, difficulty in performing complex tasks, neurological impairments, seizures, mental retardation, behavioral disorders, changes in airway responsiveness, respiratory illness, susceptibility to respiratory infection, lung inflammation, aggravation of respiratory conditions, chest pain, cough, decreased lung function, increased hospital admissions, aggravation of cardiovascular disease, and premature death. See Figure 14.6 for criteria list.

Note that NO2 levels are usually so low that they pose little direct threat to human health. NO2 however is a concern because it plays a significant role in the formation of O3, particle pollution, haze, and acid rain.

Table 14.A.: Wyoming county scorecard: emission gradesheets (1999)

Table 14.A.


Table 14.B.: Wyoming county scorecard: ambient gradesheet (1999)

Table 14.B.


Figure 14.5

Figure 14.5. Example of Thunder Basin National Grasslands visibility comparisons.

Figure 14.6

Figure 14.6. National Air Quality Index standards

14.3 Natural Pollution113

Not all pollution is manmade. Because Wyoming is the windiest state in the country, visibility can be frequently and severely limited during times of smoke, haze, and blowing snow, dust113a, and sand. Besides spoiling a normally pristine mountain view, the radiative effects from dust events may temporarily affect solar electric generating technologies that use collecting cells. Regional forest fires or long range transport of desert dust can trigger temporary losses of beam and daily irradiation in excess of 30 percent.114 Atmospheric aerosol particles influence the earth's radiation balance both directly by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, and indirectly by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Increased aerosol and CCN concentrations lead not only to increased scattering of light back to space, but also to higher cloud albedo. Enhanced CCN concentrations can also lead to increased cloud lifetimes and delay or reduce precipitation events.

In Figure 14.7, Figure 14.9, Figure 14.11, and Figure 14.13, horizontal visibilities for Casper, Cheyenne, Lander, and Sheridan reveal that, on average, visibilities are much greater than experienced in the eastern half of the US. Generally, mountains in the distance serve as range markers. As a result, measurements are grouped at specific visibility distances. In Figure 14.8, Figure 14.10, Figure 14.12, and Figure 14.14, the average broadband aerosol optical depth frequencies for Wyoming's four first class weather stations show that in winter, the air is frequently quite clear. Conditions can deteriorate in the summer, although this happens infrequently.

Figure 14.7

Figure 14.7. Casper horizontal visibility frequency (%) based on hourly observations (1961-1990) (in miles)

Figure 14.8

Figure 14.8. Casper broadband aerosol optical depth frequency based on hourly data (1961-90)

Figure 14.9

Figure 14.9. Same as Figure 14.7 except for Cheyenne (note different scaling)

Figure 14.10

Figure 14.10. Same as Figure 14.8 except for Cheyenne (note different scaling)

Figure 14.11

Figure 14.11. Same as Figure 14.7 except for Lander

Figure 14.12

Figure 14.12. Same as Figure 14.8 except for Lander.

Figure 14.13

Figure 14.13. Same as Figure 14.7 except for Sheridan

Figure 14.14

Figure 14.14. Same as Figure 14.8 except for Sheridan (note different scaling)

14.3.1 Atmospheric Aerosols115

Particles less than 100 microns in diameter are referred to as aerosol particles. These are aerodynamically stable and settle out slowly from the atmosphere. Smaller particles (approximately 1 micron) fall so slowly that they can take days or years to settle out of a quiescent atmosphere. For a turbulent atmosphere they may never fall out; however, they can be washed out by rain in a process called rainout or washout, leading to wet deposition onto the earth's surface.115a

The mean number of days by month with obstruction to vision based on atmospheric aerosols for Casper, Lander, and Sheridan is summarized in Table 14.C. Fog, smoke, haze, blowing snow, dust, and sand are used in this compilation. Obstructions to vision are less frequent during mid-day and during the summer months, when temperature inversions are minimal.

Table 14.C. Average frequency (percent) by month with obstruction to vision
from aerosols for Casper (1950-1990), Lander and Sheridan (1948-1990).

 

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

CASPER

1.8

2.6

3.2

3.0

2.3

0.8

0.3

0.3

1.4

1.8

2.0

1.8

LANDER

1.5

1.4

0.6

0.7

0.6

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.7

1.6

1.4

SHERIDAN

2.4

2.3

2.8

1.8

0.7

0.6

0.2

0.2

1.1

1.0

2.2

2.3

14.3.2 Fog

The number of days with fog are quite low across the lower elevations of Wyoming. Cheyenne has the largest number of days with fog due in part to up-slope wind conditions when high pressure is situated to the north of the state. The summer rarely sees fog while the greatest frequency generally occurs in the spring. In Table 14.D., the monthly and annual number of days with reported fog is provided for the state's first order weather stations. Fog occurs quite often at higher elevations when mountains are embedded in clouds. Fog is essentially clouds that touch the ground. With radiational heating after sunrise, fog is known to burn-off. When air is completely saturated at 100 percent relative humidity, fog results. If this parcel of moist air is heated by the sun, through warm air advection, compressional heating, or vertical mixing with drier air aloft, the relative humidity drops and the fog dissipates.

Table 14.D. Monthly number of days with fog for Casper, Cheyenne, Lander, and Sheridan (1992-2002)

 

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

ANN

CASPER

1

1

1

1

1

*

*

*

1

1

1

1

9

CHEYENNE

1

2

3

3

3

2

1

1

2

2

2

1

24

LANDER

1

1

*

*

*

*

0

*

*

*

1

1

4

SHERIDAN

1

1

1

*

*

*

*

*

*

1

1

1

6

* denotes <0.5 days

14.3.3 Blowing Snow115b

When the ground is completely snow covered, a motorist's visibility varies with wind speed in a predictable way (V=1.1 * 108 / U105) where V is visibility in meters, and wind speed measured at 10 m (33 ft) (U10) in meters per second. Visibility in blowing snow conditions is therefore approximately inversely proportional to the fifth power of wind speed. Because visibility is so sensitive to wind speed, fluctuations in wind speed makes driving in blowing snow hazardous. Over a period of 10 minutes, wind speed typically various 30 to 50 percent from the average, which causes extreme variations in visibility. For example, in Table 14.E, if wind speed averages 60 km/h (37 mph) with a variation of +/- 40 percent, visibility could vary from 1100 m (3609 ft) to 16 m (52 ft).

Table 14.E. Visibility vs 10 m wind speed for unlimited snow on the ground and without precipitation, assuming a 40 percent gust factor Table 14.E


106#. http://creativemethods.com/airquality/emission/

107#. http://creativemethods.com/airquality/maps/wyoming.htm

108#. http://www.epa.gov/air/data/pltmon.html?st~WY~Wyoming

109#. http://www.epa.gov/air/data

110#. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata/tablemis.html

111#. http://www.scorecard.org/ and http://www.scorecard.org/ranking/

112#. See, CD: 14_Air Quality, text, Air_Quality_Index folder for number of county days with air quality 1993-2002.

113#. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Overview/Overview.htm

113a#. http://www.state.sd.us/denr/DES/AirQuality/NEAP/neapalert.htm

114#. http://solardata.uoregon.edu/download/Papers/ChinasDustAffectsSolarResourceintheUSACaseStudy.pdf

115#. AMS Weather Glossary: http://64.55.87.13/amsedu/wes/glossary.html

115a#. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/

115b#. Courtesy of Tabler and Associates: http://www.tablerassociates.com/images/NoMoreBS.pdf



← Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter →


State Climate Office | Water Resources Data System


Last Modified: Fri, 17 Oct 2008